While choosing the best CPU for your PC or desktop, there are many factors to consider: what type of tasks you plan on doing, how much money you want to spend, and more. AMD’s latest Ryzen chips have been a boon for gamers and PC enthusiasts.
The new 3600x is an excellent choice for those looking to game on a budget, while the 2700 has more features that make it better suited to content creators. But which should you buy?
To dive into the details, and look at the holistic comparison between the two, don’t forget to read this article till the end.
KEY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RYZEN 7 2700X and RYZEN 5 3600 – Future Proof
The main difference between RYZEN 7 2700X and RYZEN 5 3600 is in the clock speeds, where the base clocks of the 2700X and 3600 are 100MHz apart. While a maximum boost speed for the 3600 is 800MHz higher than that of the 2700X,
This only begins once all six cores reach their max frequency. But in terms of overlocking, the 2700X has a higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) than the 3600.
SPECIFICATIONS And Comparison Chart
COMPARING THEM ON THE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE:
In this article, I have tested both variants to find out which is better by running them in the same applications and games.
Both systems follow the exact specification: MSI X570 Gaming Pro motherboard with 16GB dual-channel memory at DDR4-3200. For the graphics, I’m using my XFX RX 5700XT with a CPU.
Cinebench R20 – Single Core
As you’d expect, the R7 2700x came in second place. There is not a big difference between the CPUs since they only have four cores each. The average CPU usage on my machine was about 5% higher for the 3600 than it was for the 2700x.
Cinebench R20 – Multi Core
The R7 2700x beat the R5 3500x in this category. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X did better than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 because it has more cores: eight, and it’s 18% faster, which is impressive.
Adobe Premiere Pro (Youtube 4K H.264 60FPS)
In summary, the R7 2700x is faster. This was due to more cores. My video on youtube ran efficiently and smoothly. However, I found no noticeable difference when considering these two chips side by side.
It may be because the latest chip from AMD has a higher frequency–nearly 200 MHz–a result of engineering optimization.
Gaming and Comparison
I’ve conducted all of my tests at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.
Call on Duty
When testing with the built-in benchmark in Call of Duty Modern Warfare at 1080p, we get excellent results at all settings levels. The 3600 performed much better than the 2700x and had a significant lead in low settings (10 FPS) and high settings (7 FPS).
When switching up to 1440p, frame rates decrease. While R7 2700x is lead by a wide margin, the two CPUs are roughly on par.
Red Dead Redemption 2
I measured the framerate of Red Dead Redemption 2 while it was running on various machines. The leaked processor benchmarks indicate that the R7 2700X is better in this case,
but both perform well when tested at 1080p and high settings. When gaming at high settings at 1440p, both processors give a frame rate of 68FPS.
Tested with the built-in benchmark, even at 1080p, not much of the vast difference has been observed. The more or less similar results were obtained in low settings. The R5 3600 is only 6 FPS ahead, and in ultra settings, it was 7 FPS ahead.
At 1440p, both CPUs are similarly fast but the R5 3600 edging out just slightly more frames.
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order
In Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order, at 1080p, the ryzen 5 3600 was ahead with just 4 FPS. Even in both extreme graphics settings, R7 2700x is only slightly faster than the R5 3600. Moving up to 1440p, the two of them had given a constant 81 FPS.
The game was tested with inbuilt benchmarking at the highest settings. At 1080p, R7 2700 was 5FPS backward and moving to 1440p, R6 3600 was 4FPS better than R7 2700.
It was again tested via the in-built benchmark. Similarly, the same difference was observed between the two. Extremely small, R7 2700x was 1 FPS forward in terms of average FPS. And no such difference was observed while comparing them at 1440p.
The ultra settings PUBG was chosen to test with the same testing conditions on both the CPUs. The results are closer and quite predicated.
At 1080p, R7 2700 is 6FPS backward, and at 1440p, not much of the difference was observed, while the game was constantly played at 87 FPS on both CPUs.
Tried and tested at ultra settings with the in-built benchmark. Repeatedly, the performance was recorded, and it was observed that at R5 3600 was 3FPS ahead. While testing at 1440p, no difference in terms of FPS average was discovered.
Although the frame rates in Fortnite appear to show a more significant difference, that’s because the replay feature creates higher numbers. At the time of testing it at 1080p, this game gave 240FPS, which is more than the R7 2700x can offer. In 1440p, the 3600 was again 3 FPS ahead.
The Outer Worlds
I’ll make one last comparison with another GPU-bound title, testing the Outer Worlds with the political benchmark. An enjoyable single-threaded CPU performance might change up the whole observation till now.
The Ryzen 7 2700X and the 3600 delivered an average FPS of 147.8 and 145.3 respectively at 1920×1080 resolution, but in contrast, there was a difference of only 3FPS (144.4) between them at 1440p.
Not having much of a significant difference, as per my results, the R5 3600 was performing at a 5% higher level than the R7 2700X in all those games.
RYZEN 7 2700X: It might have comparatively less improved performance at an unbelievable price, but the high energy level is drawn out while putting heavy loads over it. However, it includes CPU coolers and software that dramatically enhance the speed.
RYZEN 5 3600: With a low price, the series offers exceptional performance, especially for gaming and heavy-duty applications. Coming up with PCIe 4.0 support and lower battery consumption, the CPU offers backward compatibility, bundled cooler, and unlocked multiplier that sounds to be a great deal.
However, it does not offer integrated graphics and has limited overclocking headroom.